BillBuddy
Back to bill feed
LaborSocial Welfare
BillSBN-83420th Congress

Amending R.A. No. 6727 (Wage Rationalization Act)

In committee Filed Aug 4, 2025
◷ Where it standsIn Committee
FiledCommittee2nd Reading3rd ReadingBicamEnacted

Filed on August 4, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Labor, Employment and Human Resources Development on August 27, 2025; it has been pending in committee since then with no recorded action.

Should you care?
Relevance to you
Broad

This bill addresses wage compliance issues affecting workers across various sectors.

WorkersEmployersContractorsLabor organizations
Timeliness
Timely

The bill responds to ongoing issues of wage non-compliance that affect workers' livelihoods.

Affects you ifWorkers in various sectorsLabor unionsEmployersContractors for infrastructure projects
Impact assessment
AI read — verify with source
Overall impact
5.6/ 10
Long title

Amending R.A. No. 6727 (Wage Rationalization Act)

Plain-language summary
AI Summary

This bill seeks to increase penalties for employers who fail to comply with wage increases and adjustments mandated by the Wage Rationalization Act. It proposes a fine of at least ₱100,000 and additional moral damages for each affected worker, along with possible imprisonment.

What this bill actually requires
RequiresIncreases penalties for non-compliance with wage increases.
RequiresRequires employers to pay double the unpaid benefits to employees.
PenalizesFines of at least ₱100,000 plus moral damages of up to ₱30,000 for each affected worker.
PenalizesImprisonment of 2 to 4 years for non-compliance.
DeadlineThis Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation.
ⓘ AI-generated — verify with the source.↗ Official Senate PDF
What changes from current law

Compared with current law:

Today

Employers face fines of ₱25,000 to ₱100,000 for wage violations.

This bill

Employers will face fines starting at ₱100,000 plus moral damages for each affected worker.

Today

No specific penalties for corporate officers.

This bill

Corporate officers can be imprisoned for wage violations.

ⓘ AI-generated comparison — verify against the bill and the cited law.
Ask this bill

The bill imposes a fine of at least ₱100,000 plus moral damages of up to ₱30,000 for each affected worker. It also includes possible imprisonment of 2 to 4 years for violators.

Source · full text
Issue areas
LaborSocial WelfareLabor rightsWorker ProtectionWage Rationalization ActEmployment Law

✦ Dashed tags are AI-suggested nuance; solid tags follow the committee taxonomy.

Legislative history
Aug 4, 2025Senate
Introduced by Senator JINGGOY EJERCITO ESTRADA;
Aug 27, 2025Senate
Read on First Reading and Referred to the Committee on LABOR, EMPLOYMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT;
✦ AI insight

Stalled: the bill has sat in the committee for over two months with no action since its referral on August 27, 2025.

Tap a term to decode it
Floor activity

No floor deliberations yet — this measure has not reached plenary. Its committee-stage actions appear under Legislative history above.

Full text
SBN-834 — verbatim textAs filed

Offer Gi i TWENTIETH CONGRESS OF THE ) REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES 25 AUG - P4 P4:59 First Regular Session RECEIVED BY SENATE S. No. - Introduced by Senator Jinggoy Ejercito Estrada AN ACT INCREASING THE PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PRESCRIBED INCREASES AND ADJUSTMENTS IN THE WAGE RATES OF WORKERS, AMENDING FOR THE PURPOSE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6727, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE "WAGE RATIONALIZATION ACT", AS AMENDED, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES EXPLANATORY NOTE Labor is a primary social economic force and as mandated by the Constitution, the State shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare. Article XIII of the Constitution dealing with Social Justice and Human Rights provisions mandates the State to afford full protection to labor and guarantees that workers shall be entitied not only to security of tenure and humane conditions of work but also a living wage and participation in policy and decision-making processes affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law. The Constitution requires the State to implement a living wage which is defined as one that ensures a "decent standard of human existence beyond mere subsistence level" in contrast to a minimum wage which is the basic pay or daily wage plus cost of living allowance received by a worker, not falling under the exemptions as provided under the Wage Rationalization Act. :

Verily, the minimum wage fixed by law is lower than the ideal living wage. Still, compliance by corporations and other work establishments has remained a persistent problem and it is very disturbing, to say the very least. With enhanced monitoring by the Department of Labor and Employment that is being proposed in this measure, it is expected that the mantle of protection we can stretch for our workers will be much more assured. It is in this light that the approval of this bill is earnestly requested. JINGGOY EJERCITO ESTRADA

TWENTIETH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES 25 AUG -4 P4:59 First Regular Session SENATE RECEIVED & S. No. _ Introduced by Senator Jinggoy Ejercito Estrada AN ACT INCREASING THE PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PRESCRIBED INCREASES AND ADJUSTMENTS IN THE WAGE RATES OF WORKERS, AMENDING FOR THE PURPOSE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6727, OTHERWISE KNOWN_ AS THE "WAGE RATIONALIZATION ACT", AS AMENDED, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled:

Section 1. Section 12 of Republic Act 6727, as further amended by Republic

2 Act 8188, is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 12. Any person, corporation, trust, firm, partnership, association or entity which refuses or fails to pay any of the prescribed increases or adjustments in the wage rates made in accordance with this Act shall be punished by a fine [not less than Twenty five thousand pesos (P25,000) nor more than One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00)] NOT LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P100,000.00) PLUS MORAL DAMAGES NOT EXCEEDING THIRTY THOUSAND PESOS (P30,000.00) FOR EACH AFFECTED WORKER AND THE COSTS OF LITIGATION INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S FEES or imprisonment of not less than two (2) years nor more than four (4) years, or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court: Provided, That

any person convicted under this Act shall not be entitled to the benefits provided for under the Probation Law. "The employer concerned shall be ordered to pay an amount equivalent to double the unpaid benefits owing to the employees: Provided, That payment of indemnity shall not absolve the employer from the criminal liability imposable under this Act. "If the violation is committed by a corporation, trust or firm, partnership, association or any other entity the penalty of imprisonment shall be imposed upon the entity's responsible officers, including, but not limited to, the president, vice- president, chief executive officer, general manager, managing director or partner. "IN CASES WHERE A FINE IS DECREED BY THE NATIONAL RELATIONS COMMISSION (NLRC) AGAINST PERSON/S WHO VIOLATED THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT AND CANNOT BE IMMEDIATELY SATISFIED BECAUSE OF THE REFUSAL TO PAY, OR IN CASE OF THE UNAVAILABILITY OR INADEQUACY OF FUNDS, THE BANK DEPOSITS, FINANCIAL INTERESTS AND OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY NOT CAPABLE OF MANUAL DELIVERY IN THE POSSESSION OR CONTROL OF THIRD PARTIES OF THE OWNER IN CASE OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP OR THE ASSETS OF THE CORPORATION, ASSOCIATIONS OR ANY OTHER ENTITY, SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY GARNISHED. IF SUCH PROPERTIES ARE NOT ENOUGH, MOVABLE AND IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES MAYBE LEVIED TO SATISFY FULLY THE IMPOSED FINES."

Sec. 2. The penalties provided under this Act shall also be applicable in cases

involving workers hired by contractors undertaking infrastructure projects under R.A.

6685 and in relation to DOLE Order No. 19, with respect to any violation in the payment of wages or its appropriate wage increases.

Sec. 3. Separability Clause. - If any provision of this Act shall be declared

unconstitutional, any other provision not affected thereby shall remain in full force 5 and effect.

Sec. 4. Repealing Clause. - All laws, decrees, orders, rules and regulations, or

7 parts thereof inconsistent with this Act ate hereby repealed or amended accordingly.

Sec. 5. Effectivity. - This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its

9 publication in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation. Approved,

Reproduced from the Senate document. The official PDF is the authoritative version.