BillBuddy
Back to bill feed
Finance & BudgetSocial Welfare
BillSBN-198320th Congress

Further Strengthening the Anti-money Laundering Council

In committee Filed Mar 16, 2026
◷ Where it standsIn Committee
FiledCommittee2nd Reading3rd ReadingBicamEnacted

Filed on March 16, 2026, and referred to the Committees on Banks, Financial Institutions and Currencies; Justice and Human Rights; and Finance; it has been pending in committee since then with no recorded action.

Should you care?
Relevance to you
Broad

The bill addresses the evolving challenges of money laundering and terrorism financing in the Philippines.

Business ownersFinancial service providersLegal professionalsOnline gaming operators
Timeliness
Timely

The bill responds to the increasing complexity of financial crimes and the need for stronger regulatory measures.

Affects you ifFinancial institutionsOnline gambling operatorsVirtual asset service providersLawyers and accountantsTrust and company service providers
Impact assessment
AI read — verify with source
Overall impact
5.6/ 10
Long title

Further Strengthening the Anti-money Laundering Council

Plain-language summary
AI Summary

Senate Bill No. 1983 aims to strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) by enhancing its authority, expanding the scope of covered persons, and updating provisions related to money laundering offenses.

What this bill actually requires
RequiresStrengthens the AMLC's role as the central authority for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing.
RequiresExpands the scope of covered persons to include trust and company service providers, lawyers, accountants, online gambling operators, and virtual asset service providers.
RequiresEnhances the AMLC's investigative powers, allowing it to issue transaction suspension orders and administrative freeze orders.
PenalizesImposes administrative sanctions of up to ₱2 million per transactional violation or ₱100,000 per calendar day for continuing violations.
ⓘ AI-generated — verify with the source.↗ Official Senate PDF
What changes from current law

Compared with current law:

Today

The AMLC has limited authority and scope in regulating financial transactions.

This bill

The AMLC will have expanded authority, including the ability to issue transaction suspension orders and administrative freeze orders.

ⓘ AI-generated comparison — verify against the bill and the cited law.
Ask this bill

The bill aims to strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) by enhancing its authority, expanding the scope of covered persons, and updating provisions related to money laundering offenses.

Source · full text
Issue areas
Finance & BudgetSocial WelfareFinancial institutionslegal professionalsAnti-money launderingOnline GamblingVirtual Assets

✦ Dashed tags are AI-suggested nuance; solid tags follow the committee taxonomy.

Legislative history
Mar 16, 2026Senate
Introduced by Senator JOEL VILLANUEVA;
Mar 17, 2026Senate
Read on First Reading and Referred to the Committees on BANKS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND CURRENCIES; JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS and FINANCE;
✦ AI insight

Stalled: the bill has sat in committee for over six months with no action since its referral on March 17, 2026.

Tap a term to decode it
Floor activity

No floor deliberations yet — this measure has not reached plenary. Its committee-stage actions appear under Legislative history above.

Full text
SBN-1983 — verbatim textAs filed

Senate TWENTIETH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES First Regular Session ) 26 MAR 16 P6:48 RECEIVED BY: SENATE Senate Bill No. 1983 Introduced by Senator JOEL VILLANUEVA AN ACT FURTHER STRENGTHENING THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COUNCIL, AMENDING FOR THE PURPOSE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9160, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS "THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT OF 2001," AS AMENDED EXPLANATORY NOTE The integrity and stability of the Philippine financial system are essential to sustaining economic growth, maintaining investor confidence, and protecting the country from the risks posed by money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit financial activities. Republic Act No. 9160, otherwise known as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001 (AMLA), has served as the cornerstone of the country's efforts to combat illicit financial flows. Through successive amendments, the Philippines has strengthened its regulatory framework to better detect suspicious transactions, improve financial transparency, and enhance cooperation with international partners. However, the financial landscape continues to evolve rapidly. The increasing use of digital financial services, virtual assets, complex corporate arrangements, and cross- border financial transactions presents new vulnerabilities that may be exploited for money laundering and related crimes. At the same time, global standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) continue to emphasize the need for stronger financial intelligence capabilities, effective supervision of covered entities, and swift enforcement mechanisms.

The Philippines' recent experience with FATF monitoring has underscored the importance of continuously strengthening the country's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) framework. Sustained reforms are necessary not only to maintain compliance with international standards, but also to safeguard the credibility and resilience of the Philippine financial system. This measure seeks to further strengthen the country's AML/CTF regime by enhancing the authority, capability, and institutional independence of the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) and modernizing key provisions of the AMLA. Among others, the bill introduces the following key reforms: 1) Strengthening the institutional role of the AMLC. The measure recognizes the AMLC as the Philippines' central anti-money laundering and counter- terrorism financing authority, serving as the country's financial intelligence unit, investigative body, and supervisory authority. 2) Expanding the scope of covered persons. The bill broadens the range of entities subject to AMLA compliance requirements to include trust and company service providers, lawyers and accountants engaged in specified financial transactions, online gambling operators, and virtual asset service providers. 3) Enhancing investigative and enforcement powers of the AMLC. The measure grants the AMLC stronger tools to detect and prevent illicit financial activities, including the authority to issue transaction suspension orders, administrative freeze orders, and subpoenas in the course of its investigations. 4) Updating predicate offenses for money laundering. The bill expands the list of unlawful activities to cover emerging crimes such as cybercrime, environmental offenses, agricultural economic sabotage, and offenses related to online sexual abuse and exploitation of children. Strengthening compliance and enforcement mechanisms. The measure improves customer due diligence and reporting requirements for covered persons, while providing stronger administrative sanctions to ensure effective compliance with AMLA regulations. By strengthening the country's anti-money laundering framework and aligning it with evolving global standards, this measure will help ensure that the Philippine financial system is not used as a conduit for illicit financial activities. These reforms are essential to promoting financial stability, protecting legitimate businesses, and safeguarding the welfare of the Filipino people. In view of the foregoing, the immediate passage of this measure is earnestly sought.

= : Senate Noffire of the Fecretary TWENTIETH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES 26 MAR 16 P6:48 First Regular Session RECEIVED BY: SENATE Senate Bill No.. 1983 Introduced by Senator JOEL VILLANUEVA AN ACT FURTHER STRENGTHENING THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COUNCIL, AMENDING FOR THE PURPOSE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9160, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS "THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT OF 2001," AS AMENDED Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled:

SECTION 1. Section 2 of Republic Act No. 9160, otherwise known as "The Anti-

2 Money Laundering Act of 2001", as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows:

SEC. 2. Declaration of Policy. - It is hereby declared the policy of the

State to protect and preserve the integrity OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM [and confidentiality of bank accounts] and to ensure that the Philippines shall not be used as a money laundering site for the proceeds of any unlawful activity, Consistent with its foreign policy, the State shall extend cooperation in transnational investigations and prosecutions of persons involved in money laundering activities wherever committed, as well as in the implementation of targeted financial sanctions related to the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction terrorism, and financing of terrorism, pursuant to the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. LIKEWISE, THE STATE SHALL MAINTAIN AN OPERATIONALLY INDEPENDENT CENTRAL ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND

COUNTER-TERRORISM FINANCING AUTHORITY THAT SHALL FUNCTION AND OPERATE AS THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT, SPECIALIZED MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING INVESTIGATION AGENCY, AND ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORISM FINANCING REGULATOR AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PHILIPPINES. IN LINE WITH THIS POLICY, AND CONSIDERING ITS UNIQUE FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES THAT AFFECT THE ECONOMY, PEACE AND ORDER, AND NATIONAL SECURITY, AMONG OTHERS, THE ANTI- MONEY LAUNDERING COUNCIL (AMLC) SHALL BE ENHANCED WITH EXPANDED AUTHORITY, CAPABILITY, AND RESOURCES.

SEC. 2. Section 3(a) of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 3. Definition. - For purposes of this Act, the following terms are hereby defined as follows: (a) "Covered Persons", natural or juridical, refer to: (1) XXX; (2) XXX; (3) XXX; (4) jewelry dealers [in precious metals, who, as a business, trade in precious metals, for transactions in excess of One million pesos (P1,000,000.00)]; (5) [jewelry] dealers in PRECIOUS METALS AND precious stones, [who, as a business, trade in precious stones, for transactions in excess of One million peses (P1,000,000.00)]; (6) TRUST AND company service providers which, as a business, OR MEANS OF LIVELIHOOD, PREPARE FOR, OR CARRY OUT, TRANSACTIONS FOR THEIR CLIENTS [provide] any of the following ACTIVITIES [services to third parties]: XXX; (ii) XXX; (iii) xxx; [and]

(iv) XXX; AND (v) ACTING AS (OR ARRANGING FOR ANOTHER TO ACT AS) A TRUSTEE OF AN EXPRESS TRUST OR PERFORMING EQUIVALENT FUNCTION FOR ANOTHER FORM OF LEGAL ARRANGEMENT. (7) persons who, AS A BUSINESS OR MEANS OF LIVELIHOOD, PREPARE FOR, OR CARRY OUT, TRANSACTIONS FOR THEIR CLIENTS CONCERNING [providel any of the following ACTIVITIES [services]: (i) managing of client money, securities or other assets; (ii) management of bank savings or securities accounts; (iii) organization of contributions for the creation, operation or management of companies; [and] (iv) creation, operation or management of juridical persons or arrangements, and buying and selling business entities; AND (V) BUYING AND SELLING REAL ESTATE. FOR THESE PURPOSES, LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS WHO PROVIDE THE FOREGOING FINANCIAL OR BUSINESS ACTIVITIES UNDER SECTIONS 3(A)(6) AND 3(A)(7) OF THIS ACT ARE COVERED PERSONS. THEY ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ACT, INCLUDING THE REPORTING OF COVERED AND SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS, WITH REGARD ONLY TO THE TRANSACTIONS CONCERNING THE COVERED ACTIVITIES UNDER SECTIONS 3(A)(6) AND 3(A)(7) OF THIS ACT. PROVIDED, THAT LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO REPORT SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS IF THE RELEVANT INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THEIR CLIENTS IN PERFORMING THEIR TASK OF DEFENDING OR REPRESENTING THEIR CLIENTS IN, OR CONCERNING

JUDICIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ARBITRATION OR MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS. (8) Casinos [including internet and ship based casinos, with respect to their casino cash transactions related to their gaming operations] IN RELATION TO THEIR FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH THEIR CUSTOMERS; (9) XXX; (10) ONLINE GAMBLING OPERATORS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR LICENSE CLASSIFICATION OR NOMENCLATURE, [Offshore gaming operators,] as well as their service providers, supervised, accredited or regulated by the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) or any government agency; AND (11) VIRTUAL ASSET SERVICE PROVIDERS."

SEC 3. Section 3(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 3. Definition. - xxx (b) "Covered transactions" is a transaction in cash or other equivalent monetary instrument involving a total amount in excess of Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) within one (1) banking day; FOR COVERED PERSONS UNDER SECTIONS 3(A)(4) AND 3(A)(5), A TRANSACTION IN CASH OR OTHER EQUIVALENT MONETARY INSTRUMENT EXCEEDING ONE MILLION PESOS (PHP1,000,000.00); for covered persons under Section 3(a)(8), a single casino cash transaction involving an amount in excess of Five million pesos (P5,000,000.00) or its equivalent in any other currency. For covered persons under Section 3(a)(9) herein, a single cash transaction involving in excess of Seven Million Five Hundred thousand pesos (7,500,000.00) or its equivalent in any other currency."

SEC. 4. Section 3(i) of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 3. Definition. - xxx

(i) "Unlawful Activity" refers to any act or omission or series or combination thereof involving or having relation to the following LAWS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AMENDMENTS: (1) xxX; (2) XXX; (3) XXX; (4) XXX; (5) XXX; ... (6) Jueteng and Masiao punished as illegal gambling under Presidential Decree No. 1602; AND ALL ILLEGAL GAMBLING ACTIVITIES DEFINED UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13, SERIES OF 2017 AND PUNISHABLE UNDER ARTICLES 195, 197, 198, AND 199 OF THE REVISED PENAL CODE; (7) xXX; (8) XXX; (9) XXX; (10) Smuggling under Republic Act No.[s. 455 and 1937] 10863, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE CUSTOMS MODERNIZATION AND TARRIFF ACT; (11) XXX; (12) XXX; -•-- (13) Terrorism [and], [e]Conspiracy to [e]Commit [t/Terrorism, AND PROVIDING MATERIAL SUPPORT TO TERRORISTS, as defined and penalized under [Sections 3 and 4 of Republic Act No. 9372] SECTIONS 4, 7, AND 12 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 11479, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE ANTI-TERRORISM ACT OF 2020; (14) xxx; (15) XXx; (16) xxx; (17) xxx; ..... ........,

(18) Violations of Sections 4 to 6 of Republic Act No. 9208, otherwise known as the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003, AS AMENDED; (19) Violations of Sections [78 to] 68, 69, 70, 71, 77, AND 79 of Chapter IV of Presidential Decree No. 705, otherwise known as the Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines, as amended; (20) Violations of Sections 86 to [106] 107, 110, 111, 114, AND 126 of Chapter VI, of Republic Act No. 8550, otherwise known as the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998, AS AMENDED; (21) XXX; (22) XXX; (23) XXX; (24) xxx; (25) xxX; (26) Violations of Sections 1 and 5 of Presidential Decree No. 1866, as amended, otherwise known as the Decree Codifying the Laws on Illegal/Unlawful Possession, Manufacture, Dealing In, Acquisition or Disposition of Firearms, Ammunition or Explosives, AND SECTION 3 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10591, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE COMPREHENSIVE FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION REGULATION ACT; (27) XXX; (28) XXX; (29) XXX; (30) xxx; (31) Violation of Section 4 AND 6 of Republic Act No. [9775] 11930, otherwise known as the [Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009] ANTI-ONLINE SEXUAL ABUSE OR EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN, AND CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE OR EXPLOITATION MATERIALS; (32) Violations of Sections 5, 7, 8, 9, 10(c), (d) and (e), 11, 12, 12- D, and 14 of Republic Act No. 7610, otherwise known as the

Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination, AS AMENDED; (33) XXX; (34) XXX; (35) Violation of Section 254 of Chapter II, Title X of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended, where the deficiency basic tax due [in the final assessment] is in excess of Twenty-five million pesos (P25,000,000.00) per taxable year, for each tax type covered. [and there has been a finding of probable cause by the competent authority: Provided, further That there must be a finding of fraud, willful misrepresentation or malicious intent on the part of the taxpayer]: Provided, [finally,] That in no case shall the AMLC institute forfeiture proceedings to recover monetary instruments, property or proceeds representing, involving, or relating to a tax crime, if the same has already been recovered or collected, OR IN THE PROCESS OF BEING RECOVERED OR COLLECTED by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in a separate proceeding; [and] (36) [Felonies or offenses of a similar nature that are punishable under the penal laws of other countries] VIOLATIONS OF

SECTION 9 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8484, OTHERWISE

KNOWN AS THE ACCESS DEVICES REGULATION ACT OF 1998, AS AMENDED; (37) VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 4 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10175, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE CYBERCRIME PREVENTION ACT OF 2012; (38) VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 2-A OF COMMONWEALTH ACT NO. 108, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE ANTI-DUMMY ACT, AS AMENDED BY PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 715;

(39) VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 7, 8, 9, 10, AND 11 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 12022, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE ANTI-AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC SABOTAGE ACT; • •..- (40) FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER ARTICLES 171 . ... AND 172 OF THE REVISED PENAL CODE, AS AMENDED; (41) VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 11 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 11765, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE FINANCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT; ...... (42) VIOLATIONS OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 12312, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE ANTI-POGO ACT OF 2025; (43) VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 13(D) OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6969, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS AND NUCLEAR WASTE CONTROL ACT; (44) VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 20(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (I), (N), (O), (P), (Q), (R), (T), AND (V) OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7586, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA SYSTEM, AS AMENDED; (45) VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 9 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7076, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE PEOPLE'S SMALL-SCALE MINING ACT; AND (46) FELONIES OF A SIMILAR NATURE THAT ARE PUNISHABLE UNDER THE PENAL LAWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES."

SEC. 5. Sections 3(1) (4) and (5) are hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 3. Definition. - xxx (1) For purposes of the covered persons under Sections 3(a)(8) and 3(a)(10), the following terms are hereby defined as follows: (1) xxx; (2) xxx; (3) XXX;

(4) [Offshore gaming operator'] "ONLINE GAMBLING OPERATOR" refers to an entity engaged in offering online games of chance or sporting events via the internet using a network and software program, by themselves or through local service providers; and (5) "Service providers" refer to duly constituted business [corporations] ENTITIES who provide components of [offshore gaming operations] ONLINE GAMBLING OPERATIONS."

SEC. 6. A new Section 3(q) is hereby inserted to read as follows:

"SEC. 3. Definition. - xxx (Q) FOR PURPOSES OF THE COVERED PERSON UNDER SECTION 3(A)(11), THE FOLLOWING TERMS ARE HEREBY DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: (1) "VIRTUAL ASSET" REFERS TO A DIGITAL REPRESENTATION OF VALUE THAT CAN BE DIGITALLY TRADED, OR TRANSFERRED, AND CAN BE USED FOR PAYMENT OR INVESTMENT PURPOSES. (2) "VIRTUAL ASSET SERVICE PROVIDER" REFERS TO ANY PERSON WHO, AS A BUSINESS, CONDUCTS ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES OR OPERATIONS FOR OR ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER NATURAL OR JURIDICAL PERSON: (i) EXCHANGE BETWEEN VIRTUAL ASSETS AND FIAT CURRENCIES; ii) EXCHANGE BETWEEN ONE OR MORE FORMS OF VIRTUAL ASSETS; (ili) TRANSFER (I.E., THE CONDUCT OF A TRANSACTION ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER PERSON THAT MOVES A VIRTUAL ASSET FROM ONE VIRTUAL ASSET ADDRESS OR ACCOUNT TO ANOTHER) OF VIRTUAL ASSETS;

(iv) SAFEKEEPING AND/OR ADMINISTRATION OF VIRTUAL ASSETS OR INSTRUMENTS ENABLING CONTROL OVER VIRTUAL ASSETS; AND (v) PARTICIPATION IN AND PROVISION OF FINANCIAL SERVICE RELATED TO AN ISSUER'S OFFER AND/OR SALE OF A VIRTUAL ASSET."

SEC. 7. A new Section 3(r) is hereby inserted to read as follows:

"SEC. 3. Definition. - xxx (R) FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 14(F), THE FOLLOWING TERMS ARE HEREBY DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: (1) "TRANSACTIONAL VIOLATION" REFERS TO AN ACT OR OMISSION CONSTITUTING A VIOLATION OF ANY APPLICABLE LAW, OR ANY REGULATION OR ORDER ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL, OR ANY ORDER BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE AMLC, WHICH IS CONSUMMATED AND CONCLUDED IN A SINGLE INSTANCE OR OCCASION. (2) "CONTINUING VIOLATION" REFERS TO AN ACT OR OMISSION CONSTITUTING A VIOLATION OF ANY APPLICABLE LAW, OR ANY REGULATION OR ORDER ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL, OR ANY ORDER BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE AMLC, IN WHICH THE VIOLATION PERSISTS OR LINGERS OVER TIME FROM THE INSTANT THE PARTICULAR ACT WAS COMMITTED OR OMITTED UNTIL THE VIOLATION IS STOPPED."

Section 8. Section 7 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 7. Creation of the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC). - X X

(1) to SERVE AS THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT OF THE PHILIPPINES WITH THE AUTHORITY TO require, receive and analyze covered or suspicious transactions reports from covered persons; (2) XXX; (3) to institute civil forfeiture proceedings, and all other remedial proceedings DIRECTLY WITH THE COMPETENT COURT, or through the Office of the Solicitor General; (4) XXx; (5) XXX; (6) TO ISSUE, EX PARTE, AN ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER, AND to apply before the Court of Appeals, ex DE parte, for the freezing of any monetary instrument or property [alleged to be laundered, proceeds from, or instrumentalities used in or intended for use] THAT IS RELATED in any WAY TO AN unlawful activity as defined in Section 3(i) hereof OR MONEY LAUNDERING OFFENSE; (7) to FORMULATE AND implement such RULES, REGULATIONS, AND measures as may be necessary and justified under this Act to counteract money laundering; (8) XXX; (9) xxX; (10) xxx; (11) XXX; (12) Xxx; (13) xxx; (14) in the conduct of its [investigation] INVESTIGATORY, PROSECUTORIAL, AND QUASI-JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS, the AMLC shall [apply for the issuance of] HAVE THE POWER TO ISSUE subpoena ad testificandum and/or subpoena duces tecum [with-any competent court]; (15) xxx;

(16) to preserve, manage, or dispose assets pursuant to aN ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER, freeze order, asset preservation order, or judgement of forfeiture, INCLUDING THE AUTHORITY TO PHYSICALLY POSSESS AND MANAGE MONETARY INSTRUMENTS AND PROPERTIES THAT ARE IN DANGER OF BEING LOST, REMOVED, MATERIALLY INJURED, WASTED, OR DISIPATED: Provided, however, That pending their turnover to the national government, all expenses incurred in relation to the duties herein mentioned shall be deducted from the amount to be turned over to the national government; (17) TO SERVE AS THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING SUPERVISOR WITH THE AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE VISITATION, INSPECTION, AND EXAMINATION POWERS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE BY ALL COVERED PERSONS, AND THEIR RESPONSIBLE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES, WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ACT, ITS IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND OTHER ISSUANCES OF THE COUNCIL. PROVIDED, THAT THE AMLC MAY DEPUTIZE SUPERVISING AUTHORITIES TO CONDUCT THE ACTUAL COMPLIANCE CHECKING AND IMPOSITION OF ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS ON THE PERSONS AND ENTITIES UNDER THEIR RESPECTIVE PRUDENTIAL SUPERVISION, SUBJECT TO THE ESCALATION TO THE AMLC OF FINDINGS CONCERNING HIGH-RISK VIOLATIONS; (18) TO ENTER INTO ANY CONTRACT OR TRANSACTION FOR THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP, POSSESSION, ADMINISTRATI, LEASE, DISPOSITION, OR ACCEPTANCE OF REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY IN ITS NAME, UNDER SUCH CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE COUNCIL;

(19) TO DETERMINE AND IMPOSE SUPERVISORY, ACCREDITATION, AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE FEES; (20) TO SPEARHEAD THE NATIONAL COORDINATION MECHANISM TO IDENTIFY AND ASSESS THE MONEY LAUNDERING, TERRORISM FINANCING, AND PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FINANCING RISKS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INCLUDING FORMULATION AND ADOPTION OF NATIONAL STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS THE SAID RISKS; AND (21) TO DELEGATE SUCH AUTHORITIES TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR ANY OFFICER OR OPERATING UNIT OF THE AMLC UNDER SUCH GUIDELINES THE COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE."

SEC. 9. A new Section 7-A is hereby inserted to read as follows:

"SECTION 7-A. RESPONSIBILITY. - THE GENERAL RULE AND THE EXCEPTION THEREFROM ON THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 38 AND 39 OF CHAPTER 9, BOOK 1 OF THE REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF 1987 SHALL APPLY TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL AND OTHER PERSONNEL OF THE AMLC. IN THE LAWFUL AND AUTHORIZED EXERCISE OF ITS POWERS AND PERFORMANCE OF ITS OFFICIAL DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS, THE AMLC, THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, AND ITS PERSONNEL, SHALL BE PRESUMED TO HAVE ACTED IN GOOD FAITH. UNLESS THE ACTIONS OR OMISSIONS IN RELATION THERETO HAVE BEEN ADJUDGED TO HAVE BEEN PERFORMED IN EVIDENT BAD FAITH, OR WITH GROSS NEGLIGENCE, THEY SHALL BE HELD FREE AND HARMLESS FROM LIABILITY TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, AND THEY SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED FOR ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, LOSSES, CLAIMS, DEMANDS,

DAMAGES, DEFICIENCIES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES OF WHATSOEVER KIND AND NATURE THAT MAY ARISE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH."

SEC. 10. Section 8-A of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"Section 8-A. Information Security and Confidentiality. - THE COUNCIL, AND THE OFFICERS AND STAFF OF the AMLC Land its Secretariat] shall securely protect information received or processed and shall not reveal, in any manner, any information known to them by reason of their office. THIS PROHIBITION SHALL ALSO APPLY TO ALL RESPONSIBLE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES OF COVERED PERSONS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, SUPERVISING AUTHORITIES, OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, SUPPLIERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, CONSULTANTS, TRAINEES, DETAILED, SECONDED, OR ENLISTED PERSONNEL, AND OTHER PERSONS AND ENTITIES WITH WHOM THE AMLC SHARED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OR FOR WHOM AN ACCESS WAS GIVEN TO THE SAID INFORMATION, AS ALLOWED UNDER THE SUCCEEDING PARAGRAPH. NEITHER MAY SUCH INFORMATION BE PUBLISHED OR AIRED IN ANY MANNER OR FORM BY THE MASS MEDIA OR SOCIAL MEDIA, ELECTRONIC MAIL, OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES OR TECHNOLOGY, UNLESS ALLOWED WITHIN THE PARAMETERS SET BY THE COUNCIL. This prohibition shall apply even after their separation from the AMLC, OR RESPECTIVE OFFICES, OR AFTER THE LAPSE OF THEIR CONTRACT, ARRANGEMENT, OR OTHER AGREEMENT WITH THE AMLC, AS THE CASE MAY BE. The AMLC shall formulate rules governing information exchange and dissemination, the security and confidentiality of such information, including procedures for handling, storage, and protection of, as well as access to such information. WHEN EXCHANGING AND DISSEMINATING INFORMATION UNDER SUCH RULES, THE COUNCIL, AND THE OFFICERS AND STAFF OF THE AMLC SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO

HAVE VIOLATED THE PROVISIONS ON INFORMATION SECURITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY HEREOF."

SEC. 11. A new Section 8-B is hereby inserted to read as follows:

"SECTION 8-B. ISSUANCE OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST AMLC ACTIONS. - NO COURT, OTHER THAN THE COURT OF APPEALS AND THE SUPREME COURT, SHALL ISSUE ANY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR INJUNCTION AGAINST THE AMLC FOR ANY ACTION UNDER THIS ACT. ANY RESTRAINING ORDER OR INJUNCTION ISSUED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS VOID AND OF NO FORCE AND EFFECT."

SEC. 12. Section 9 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 9. Prevention of Money Laundering: Customer Due Diligence, Record-Keeping, Transaction Reporting, and Registration Requirements. - (a) Customer Identification. - Covered persons shall CONDUCT CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE BY establishING and recordING the true identity of its clients based on official documents, OR OTHER RELIABLE, INDEPENDENT SOURCE DOCUMENTS, DATA OE INFORMATION. Provided, that for casinos, the requirement of customer due diligence shall be performed for transactions involving the amount in excess of One Hundred Fifty .... Thousand Pesos (PHP150,000.00), or its equivalent in foreign currency. COVERED PERSONS [They] shall maintain a system of verifying the true identity of their clients and, in case of corporate clients, require a system of verifying their legal existence and .... organizational structure, as well as the authority and identification of all persons purporting to act on their behalf. COVERED PERSONS SHALL EXAMINE THE BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF ALL COMPLEX, UNUSUALLY LARGE

TRANSACTIONS, ALL UNUSUAL PATTERNS OF TRANSACTIONS, WHICH HAVE NO APPARENT ECONOMIC OR LAWFUL PURPOSE, AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED SUSPICIOUS. WHERE THE RISKS ARE HIGHER, COVERED PERSONS SHALL CONDUCT ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE. FOR THESE PURPOSES, COVERED PERSONS ARE AUTHORIZED TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER COVERED PERSONS TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF UNUSUAL OR SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS. THE PROVISIONS OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 1405, AS AMENDED; REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6426, AS AMENDED; REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8367; AND REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10173, SHALL NOT APPLY DURING THE VERIFICATION PROCESS WITH OTHER COVERED PERSONS. The provisions of existing laws to the contrary notwithstanding, anonymous accounts, accounts under fictitious names, and all other similar accounts shall be absolutely prohibited. Peso and foreign currency non-checking numbered accounts shall be allowed. The BSP may conduct annual testing solely limited to the determination of the existence and true identity of the owners of such accounts. (b) Record-Keeping. - XXX (c) Reporting of Covered and Suspicious Transactions. - Covered persons shall report to the AMLC all covered transactions and suspicious transactions within five (5) working days from occurrence thereof, unless the AMLC prescribes a different period not exceeding fifteen (15) working days. [Lawyers and accountants acting as independent legal professionals are not required to report covered and suspicious transactions if the relevant information was obtained in circumstances where they are subject to professional secrecy or legal professional privilege.] Should a transaction be determined to be both a covered transaction and a suspicious transaction, the covered person shall be required to report the same as a suspicious transaction.

XXX (d) REGISTRATION WITH THE AMLC. - COVERED PERSONS SHALL REGISTER WITH THE AMLC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES PRESCRIBED FOR SUCH PURPOSE. SUPERVISING AUTHORITIES AND OTHER LICENSING OR BUSINESS REGISTRATION AUTHORITIES OF COVERED PERSONS SHALL PRESCRIBE REGISTRATION WITH THE AMLC AS A REQUIREMENT FOR CONTINUED LICENSING AND/OR OPERATIONS, AND, WHEN NECESSARY, TRANSACTING WITH OTHER COVERED PERSONS."

SEC. 13. Section 10 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 10. AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND TRANSACTIONS AND Freezing of Monetary Instrument or Property. - (A) Upon [a verified ex parte petition by the AMLC and after] determination any monetary that probable cause exists that instrument or property is in any way related to an unlawful activity as defined in Section 3(i) hereof, THE COUNCIL [the Court of Appeals] may issue, EX PARTE, aN ADMINISTRATIVE freeze order which shall be effective immediately, for a period of twenty (20) days. Within the [twenty (20) day period] NEXT WORKING DAY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER THE AMLC SHALL FILE A PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF A FREEZE ORDER BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS: PROVIDED, THAT, THE TWENTY-DAY PERIOD OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER SHALL REMAIN EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE COURT OF APPEALS RESOLVES THE PETITION. PROVIDED, FURTHER THAT, WITHIN THE PERIOD OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER, the Court of Appeals shall conduct a summary hearing, with notice to the parties, to determine whether or not to modify or lift the ADMINISTRATIVE freeze order or extend its effectivity BY ISSUING A FREEZE ORDER WHICH

SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FOR A PERIOD [The total period of the freeze order issued by the Court of Appeals under this provision shall] not exceeding six (6) months. [This is without prejudice to an asset preservation order that the Regional Trial Court having jurisdiction over the appropriate anti money laundering case or civil forfeiture case may issue on the same account depending on the circumstances of the case, where the Court of Appeals will remand the case and its records; Provided, That if there is no case filed against a person whose account has been frozen within the period determined by the Court of Appeals, not exceeding six (6) months, the freeze order shall be deemed ipso facto lifted; Provided, further, That this new rule shalt not apply to pending cases in the courts. In any case, the court should act on the petition to freeze within twenty four (24) hours from filing of the petition. If the application is filed a day before a nonworking day, the computation of the twenty-four (24) hour period shall exclude the nonworking days.] [The freeze order or asset preservation order issued under this Act shall be limited only to the amount of cash or monetary instrument or value of property that court finds there is probable cause to be considered as proceeds of a predicate offense, and the freeze order or asset preservation order shall not apply to amounts in the same account in excess of the amount or value of the proceeds of the predicate offense.] A person whose [account] MONETARY INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY has been THE SUBJECT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER OR FREEZE ORDER [frozen] may [file a motion to lift the freeze order and the court must resolve this motion before the expiration of the freeze order] MOVE FOR ITS LIFTING BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER OR THE FREEZE ORDER SHALL INCLUDE THOSE MONETARY INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY HAVING EQUIVALENT VALUE TO THE MONETARY

INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY FOUND TO BE RELATED IN ANY WAY TO AN UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY OR MONEY LAUNDERING OFFENSE, WHEN WITH DUE DILIGENCE, THE FORMER CANNOT BE LOCATED, OR IT HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED, DESTROYED, DIMINISHED IN VALUE OR OTHERWISE RENDERED WORTHLESS BY ANY ACT OR OMISSION, OR IT HAS BEEN CONCEALED, REMOVED, CONVERTED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED, OR IT IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE PHILIPPINES OR HAS BEEN PLACED OR BROUGHT OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL AND THE COURT OF APPEALS, OR IT HAS BEEN COMMINGLED WITH OTHER MONETARY INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY BELONGING TO EITHER THE RESPONDENT OR A THIRD PERSON OR ENTITY, THEREBY RENDERING THE SAME DIFFICULT TO IDENTIFY OR BE SEGREGATED FOR PURPOSES OF FREEZING. THIS IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO AN ASSET PRESERVATION ORDER THAT THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE APPROPRIATE MONEY LAUNDERING CASE OR CIVIL FORFEITURE CASE MAY ISSUE ON THE SAME MONETARY INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WHERE THE COURT OF APPEALS WILL REMAND THE CASE AND ITS RECORDS; PROVIDED, THAT IF THERE IS NO CASE FILED AGAINST A PERSON WHOSE MONETARY INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY HAS BEEN FROZEN WITHIN THE PERIOD DETERMINED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS, THE FREEZE ORDER SHALL BE DEEMED IPSO FACTO LIFTED; PROVIDED, FURTHER, THAT THIS RULE SHALL NOT APPLY TO PENDING PETITIONS FOR FREEZE ORDERS. THE PERSON WHOSE MONETARY INSTRUMENT OR PROPERTY HAS BEEN FROZEN MAY WITHDRAW SUCH SUMS

AS THE AMLC DETERMINES REASONABLE FOR MONTHLY FAMILY NEEDS AND SUSTENANCE, INCLUDING THE SERVICES OF COUNSEL AND FAMILY MEDICAL NEEDS. A COVERED PERSON OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY, OR ANY OF ITS RESPONSIBLE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE HELD FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY ACCOUNTABILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ACT DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH AN ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER FROM THE COUNCIL OR FREEZE ORDER FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS. No court shall issue a temporary restraining order or a writ of injunction against any freeze order, except the Supreme Court. -..- (B) XXX (C) THE AMLC, EITHER UPON ITS OWN INITIATIVE, OR AT THE REQUEST OF A COVERED PERSON OR DOMESTIC OR FOREIGN COMPETENT AUTHORITIES, IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE, EX PARTE, A TRANSACTION SUSPENSION ORDER, UPON REASONABLE SUSPICION THAT A TRANSACTION OR FUND IS UNUSUAL, WITHOUT CLEAR ECONOMIC PURPOSE, FROM UNKNOWN OR ILLEGAL SOURCE, OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO AN UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY OR MONEY LAUNDERING OFFENSE. THE AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND TRANSACTION OR FUND UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE -.. EXERCISED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER OR OPERATING UNIT OF THE AMLC. THE TRANSACTION SUSPENSION ORDER SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FOR A PERIOD OF FIFTEEN (15) WORKING DAYS FROM RECEIPT THEREOF, UNLESS THE COUNCIL PRESCRIBES ANOTHER PERIOD NOT EXCEEDING THIRTY (30) WORKING DAYS. PROVIDED, THAT IF THERE IS NO ADMINISTRATIVE FREEZE ORDER ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL

OR A PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF FREEZE ORDER FILED BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS, THE TRANSACTION SUSPENSION ORDER SHALL BE DEEMED IPSO FACTO REVOKED WITHOUT NEED OF CONFIRMATION FROM THE AMLC. A PERSON WHOSE TRANSACTION OR FUND HAS BEEN SUSPENDED MAY MOVE FOR THE REVOCATION OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER SUBJECT TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE AMLC. A COVERED PERSON, OR ANY OF ITS RESPONSIBLE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE HELD FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY ACCOUNTABILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ACT DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH A TEMPORARY SUSPENSION ORDER FROM THE AMLC. NO COURT SHALL ISSUE A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR A WRIT OF INJUNCTION AGAINST ANY TRANSACTION SUSPENSION ORDER, EXCEPT THE COURT OF APPEALS AND THE SUPREME COURT."

SEC. 14. Section 11 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 11. Authority to Inquire into Bank Deposits. - Notwithstanding the provisions of Republic Act No. 1405, as amended; Republic Act No. 6426, as amended; Republic Act No. 8791; REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10173; and other laws, the AMLC may inquire into or examine any particular deposit or investment, with any banking institution or non-bank financial institution [upen order of any competent court based on an ex parte application in eases of violations of this Act, when it has been established that there is], WHICH, BASED ON probable cause, [that the deposits or investments, including related accounts involved, are] MAY BE related [to an unlawful activity as defined] IN THE COMMISSION, PROCEEDS, OR INSTRUMENTALITIES OF ANY UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY UNDER

Section 3(i) E(1), (2) and (12)] hereof; [and felonies or offenses of a nature

similar to those mentioned in Section 3(i)(1), (2) and (12), which are punishable under the penal laws of other countries, and terrorism and conspiracy to commit terrorism as defined and penalized under Republic Act No. 9372] IS THE subject of a money laundering investigation or prosecution; or THE subject of a request for assistance from a foreign State. Ithe Court of Appeals shall act on the application to inquire into or examine any deposit or investment with any banking institution or non-bank financial institution within twenty four (24) hours from filing of the application. Fo ensure compliance with this Act, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas may, in the course of a periodic or special examination, check the compliance of a covered person with the requirements of the AMLA and its implementing rules and regulations. For purposes of this section, 'related accounts' shall refer to accounts, the funds and sources of which originated from and/or are materially linked to the monetary instruments) or property(ies) subject of the freeze erder(s). A court order ex parte must first be obtained before the AMLE can inquire into these related accounts: Provided, That the procedure for the ex parte application of the ex parte court order for the principal account shall be the same with that of the related accounts. The authority to inquire into or examine the main account and the related accounts shall comply with the requirements of Article III, Sections 2 and 3 of the 1987 Constitution which are hereby incorporated by reference.] THE AUTHORITY TO INQUIRE INTO DEPOSIT OR INVESTMENT UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE EXERCISED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER OR OPERATING UNIT OF THE AMLC. NO COURT BELOW THE COURT OF APPEALS SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION TO ENJOIN THE AMLC FROM EXERCISING ITS AUTHORITY TO INQUIRE INTO OR EXAMINE ANY DEPOSIT OR INVESTMENT UNDER THIS ACT.

A COVERED PERSON, OR ANY OF ITS RESPONSIBLE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE HELD FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY ACCOUNTABILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ACT DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH AN ORDER FROM THE AMLC FOR AN INQUIRY OF A DEPOSIT, OR INVESTMENT. TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ACT, THE AMLC AND THE SUPERVISING AUTHORITIES MAY, IN THE COURSE OF A PERIODIC OR SPECIAL EXAMINATION OR INSPECTION, CHECK COMPLIANCE OF A COVERED PERSON WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMLA AND ITS IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS."

SEC. 15. Section 12 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 12. Forfeiture Provisions. - (A) Civil Forfeiture. - Upon determination by the [AMLE] COUNCIL that probable cause exists that any monetary instrument or property is in any way related to an unlawful activity as defined in Section 3(i) or a money laundering offense under Section 4 hereof, the AMLC shall file, EX PARTE, with the COMPETENT [appropriate] court OR through the Office of the Solicitor General, a verified [ex partel petition for forfeiture. [and the Rules of Court on Civil Forfeiture shall apply.] The forfeiture shall include those other monetary instrument or property having an equivalent value to that of the monetary instrument or property found to be related in any way to an unlawful activity or a money laundering offense, when with due diligence, the former cannot be located, or it has been substantially altered, destroyed, diminished in value or otherwise rendered worthless by any act or omission, or it has been concealed, removed, converted, or otherwise transferred, or it is located outside the Philippines or has been placed or brought outside the jurisdiction of the court, or it has been commingled with other monetary instrument or property belonging to either the [offender himself] RESPONDENT or a third

person or entity, thereby rendering the same difficult to identify or be segregated for purposes of forfeiture. (B) Claim on Forfeited Assets. - xxx. Payment in Lieu of Forfeiture. - xxx (D) XXX (E) LAWS ON PRESCRIPTION. - THE LAWS CONCERNING ACQUISITIVE PRESCRIPTION AND LIMITATION OF ACTIONS CANNOT BE INVOKED BY, NOR SHALL THEY BENEFIT THE RESPONDENT, IN RESPECT OF ANY UNLAWFULLY ACQUIRED MONETARY INSTRUMENT, PROPERTY, OR PROCEEDS, AND THEIR FRUITS.

SEC. 16. Section 14 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 14. Penal Provisions. - xxx. (F) Imposition of Administrative Sanctions. The imposition of the administrative sanctions shall be without prejudice to the filing of criminal charges against the persons responsible for the violation. After due notice and hearing, the AMLC shall, at its discretion, impose sanctions, including BUT NOT LIMITED TO monetary penalties, RESTITUTION, SUSPENSION OR DISQUALIFICATION FROM BEING A DIRECTOR, OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE OF A COVERED PERSON, REVOCATION OF AMLO REGISTRATION, INCREASED MONITORING, INCLUSION IN A LIST OF AMLA VIOLATORS AND ITS PUBLICATION, WARNING, OR REPRIMAND, UPON ANY COVERED PERSON, .... AND ITS DIRECTORS, warning or reprimand, upon any covered person, its directors, officers, employees or any other person for the violation of this Act, its implementing rules and regulations, or for failure or refusal to comply with AMLC orders, resolutions and other issuances. Such monetary penalties shall be in amounts as may be determined by the AMLC to be appropriate, which shall not be more than [Five hundred thousand Philippine pesos (P500,000.00) per

violation.] TWO MILLION PHILIPPINE PESOS (PHP2,000,000.00) PER TRANSACTIONAL VIOLATION, OR ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PHILIPPINE PESOS (PHP100,000.00) PER CALENDAR DAY FOR VIOLATIONS OF CONTINUING NATURE. RESIGNATION, TERMINATION, OR OTHERWISE SEPARATION FROM OFFICE SHALL NOT EXEMPT SUCH DIRECTOR, OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS. THE DECISION OF THE AMLC IN ADMINISTRATIVE CASES SHALL BE FINAL AND EXECUTORY, AND MAY NOT BE RESTRAINED OR SET ASIDE BY THE COURT, EXCEPT ON PETITION FOR CERTIORARI ON THE GROUND OF GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION, OR LACK OR EXCESS OF JURISDICTION OF THE AMLC. PROVIDED, THAT THE AGGRIEVED PARTY SHALL FILE THE PETITION WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS. IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS QUASI-JUDICIAL FUNCTION, THE AMLC SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO ISSUE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND SUMMON WITNESSES TO APPEAR IN THEIR PROCEEDINGS AND WHEN APPROPRIATE, ORDER THE EXAMINATION, SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF ALL DOCUMENTS, AND BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF ANY ENTITY OR PERSON UNDER INVESTIGATION AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER DISPOSITION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CASES BEFORE IT. FURTHER, THE AMLC SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT, BOTH DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF AND PENALTIES PRESCRIBED BY THE RULES OF COURT. THE QUASI-JUDICIAL POWER OF THE AMLC SHALL BE EXERCISED DIRECTLY BY THE COUNCIL OR THE DULY

AUTHORIZED HEARING OFFICER OR PANEL OF HEARING OFFICERS OF THE AMLC, UNDER SUCH RULES AND CONDITIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL. PROVIDED FURTHER, THAT THE DECISION OF THE AUTHORIZED HEARING OFFICER OR PANEL OF HEARING OFFICERS SHALL NOT BE APPEALABLE TO THE COUNCIL. The AMLC may promulgate rules on fines and penalties taking into consideration the attendant circumstances, such as the nature and gravity of the violation or irregularity. THE FINES PRESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE INCREASED BY TEN PERCENT (10%) EVERY FIVE YEARS TO COMPENSATE FOR INFLATION AND TO MAINTAIN THE DETERRENT FUNCTION OF SUCH FINES."

SEC. 17. A new Section 15-A shall be inserted to read as follows:

"SEC. 15-A. RETENTION AND USE OF FORFEITED ASSETS. - THE AMLC SHALL BE AUTHORIZED TO RETAIN AND USE THE ASSETS FORFEITED FOR THE YEAR, PROVIDED, THAT IN NO CASE SHALL SAID ANNUAL APPROPRIATION EXCEED ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION PESOS (P150,000,000.00). THE FOREGOING FUNDS SHALL ACCRUE TO A TRUST FUND TO BE MANAGED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE COUNCIL, AS A SPECIAL ACCOUNT, IN ANY GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. THE FUNDS SHALL BE USED EXCLUSIVELY TO AUGMENT THE AMLC'S OPERATIONAL EXPENSES."

SEC. 18. A new Section 22-A shall be inserted to read as follows:

"SEC. 22-A. FUNDING SOURCE. - THE FUNDS REQUIRED FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT AND OTHER OPERATING .... EXPENSES OF THE AMLC, SHALL BE TAKEN FROM: (A) THE GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT; (B) AUTHORIZED RETAINED FORFEITED ASSETS; AND

(C) SUPERVISORY, ACCREDITATION, AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE FEES COLLECTED, IF ANY."

SEC. 19. Implementing Rules and Regulations. - Rules and regulations

necessary for the effective and efficient enforcement of the provisions of this Act shall be formulated by the AMLC, and it shall be implemented within ninety (90) days from the effectivity of this Act.

SEC. 20. Separability Clause. - If any portion or provision of this Act is

declared unconstitutional, the remainder hereof or any provisions not affected thereby shall remain in force and effect.

SEC. 21. Repealing Clause. - Any law, presidential decree or issuance,

executive order, letter of instruction, rule, or regulation inconsistent with the provisions of this Act is hereby repealed or modified accordingly.

SEC. 22. Effectivity. - This Act shall take effect immediately after its complete

publication in the Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation. Approved,

Reproduced from the Senate document. The official PDF is the authoritative version.